Pornography has become the default sex educator for large numbers of young people. Viewing pornography is routine, especially among boys and young men, as recent studies document, including two in Australia. Children and young people are encountering pornography in greater numbers, at younger ages, and with a wider variety of content.

Pornography is a powerful sexual socializer. There is robust evidence of pornography’s impacts, across seven domains, among young people and adults. Some are relatively innocuous; others are deeply troubling.

First, especially for the youngest children, some are shocked, troubled, or disturbed by premature or inadvertent exposure to sexually explicit material, although others are not.

Second, unsurprisingly, pornography provides sexual information and liberalization. Young people who use porn develop greater sexual knowledge (including about bodies and practices) and more liberalized sexual attitudes than others, as longitudinal studies in the Netherlands and US have found.

Third, pornography can shift users’ sexual interests, behaviors, and relations. The most well-documented example is that young men who use pornography are more likely than others to be interested in, and to try to have, anal intercourse. Studies also find links between pornography use and unsafe sex, and other behaviors. Pornography shapes its users’ “sexual scripts,” modeling behavior and guiding their sexual expectations.

Fourth, pornography can lower relationship satisfaction. A 2017 study in Human Communication Research found that pornography use is associated with men’s lower sexual and relationship satisfaction in relationships. Some studies also find that for women, male partners’ pornography use reduces intimacy, feeds self-objectification and bodily shame, or is accompanied by coercion into sexual acts.

Fifth, some individuals come to use pornography in ways that are compulsive, with damaging consequences for themselves or others. Whether we understand this as an addiction or an impulse control disorder, there is no doubt that some users experience their use as harmful. There are debates over whether pornography is or isn’t a significant contributor to men’s problems with desire, erection, and orgasm, and it may be particularly so for men with self-reported problematic use.

The last two areas of impact are the ones that concern me most. Sixth, pornography teaches sexist and sexually objectifying understandings of gender and sexuality. It shapes how boys and men see girls and women, and how girls and women see themselves. In a randomized experimental study among young adults in Denmark, exposure to nonviolent pornography led to less egalitarian attitudes and higher levels of hostile sexism among young men. In a longitudinal study among US adolescents, increased use of sexually explicit media predicted more sexist attitudes for girls two years later.

Finally, pornography teaches sexually aggressive and violencesupportive attitudes and behaviors. Correlational studies find associations between pornography use and sexually aggressive and violence-supportive attitudes, in both meta-analyses and further recent studies among adolescents and adults. They also find associations between pornography use and actual violent behaviors, as meta-analyses in both 2000 and 2015 showed. Other research finds that men who use pornography more often are more likely to practice or desire dominant and degrading practices such as gagging and choking. Women who use pornography are more likely to practice or desire submissive practices such as being choked, slapped, gagged, and so on, especially if their first pornography exposure was at a young age.

Correlational studies cannot show the direction of causality, but experimental and longitudinal studies can. Experimental studies find that people shown pornography show increases in sexually violent attitudes and behaviors. Finally, longitudinal studies find that pornography use predicts later sexually violent attitudes and behaviors. For example, in a study of U.S. youth conducted over three years, individuals who used violent pornography were more than six times as likely as others to engage in sexually aggressive behavior. In another study among adolescents, males’ use of sexually explicit media predicted more frequent sexual harassing behaviors two years later.

The effects of pornography are neither inevitable nor all-powerful. The impacts of pornography are mediated by four factors: the characteristics of the viewer, their engagement with the material, its content, and the character and context of use.

Pornography is an important risk factor for sexual violence. But its risks are greater for some users than others. If a 16-year-old boy already has hostile and sexist attitudes toward girls, he is more likely to be drawn to violent pornography, and this pornography will have a greater influence on the likelihood that he will pressure or coerce girls into sex. Sexual violence is shaped by multiple social and cultural factors, of which pornography use is only one.

We need to know much more about how young people use, and engage with pornography. But in recognizing their active use of sexual media, we should not pretend that pornography has no effects. As a recent review of 43 studies among adolescents and emerging adults documents, sexually explicit and sexually violent media have clear effects on domestic and sexual violence perpetration and victimization.

How Can We Limit Pornography’s Harms Among Children and Youth?

Leaving aside legal strategies, I focus on three areas to limit pornography’s harms: First, comprehensive sexuality education in schools is vital for providing alternative, age-appropriate content on sexuality. Second, curricula on pornography can teach young people to respond more critically to pornography. “Pornography education” seeks to support young people to critically evaluate and respond to pornography’s influence in order to minimize its harms and equip them for healthy relationships. Australia has already produced good curricula. Such efforts do work. In a Dutch longitudinal study, the more a young person had learned about the use of pornography from their school-based sex education, the less likely they were to develop a view of women as sex objects. In a US evaluation of a five-session curriculum, students showed positive changes in their pornography-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions.

Parents may worry that teaching about pornography in schools will encourage students to seek it, but there is no sign that school curricula prompt young people to seek out pornography for the first time, or that researchers asking adolescents about pornography encourages its use.

“Better” and “Ethical” Pornography?

Third, we need better pornography, what some call “ethical pornography”— ethical in its production, use and distribution, and content.

Participants should have consented to their involvement and not be harmed. The unethical production of porn is common: among Australians aged 16–49, 12 percent of males and 6.2 percent of females have taken a nude or sexual image of another person without their consent. Ethical pornography also involves ethical use and distribution. People consent to its viewing, and it is not distributed without participants’ consent.

However, discussions of “ethical” pornography have largely ignored the issue of content. Yet physical and verbal aggression is routine in pornography. An analysis of top-selling and top-renting titles found that 88 percent of scenes showed aggression, largely by males and overwhelmingly against females.

So we must also hold the pornography industries to account. They must produce better pornography, which eroticizes consent, respect, and intimacy rather than sexist hostility.

Parents also have asked me: “My son is looking at porn. What kind of porn should he be looking at?” Maybe we need “free range” pornography, even a ratings system, the “Healthy Sex Seal of Approval”?

Even depictions of consensual sex may perpetuate the sexual objectification of women and reinforce other sexist social norms. And in a sexist culture, even the most ethical images of sex may be understood in ways that affirm that wider culture. Still, it seems pragmatic to give attention to what might comprise “better” or at least “less worse” pornography.

Regardless of our individual moral or political leanings, it is our collective responsibility not just to prevent and reduce the harms pornography causes, but also to foster children’s and young people’s healthy sexualities.

 

Dr. Michael Flood is an internationally recognized researcher on men, masculinities, gender equality, and violence prevention. An occasional contributor to Voice Male, he is the author of Engaging Men and Boys in Violence Prevention (2018), lead editor of Engaging Men in Building Gender Equality (2015) and The International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities (2007). He lives and works in Australia.

 

 

 

I’m a [36]-year-old erotic performer who has done various types of sex work and sex work activism, including pornography. Part of my personal brand is that the work I do is socially conscious, ethical both in the performance and the production, based in genuine chemistry and consensual, negotiated sex. I care deeply about working with companies that reflect a diverse, trans-inclusive, body-positive cast, which I am able to manifest because I live in the San Francisco area. Even so, I am not dependent on porn for my living, I am white and cisgendered—so I have intersections of privilege there as well.

I fundamentally believe that ethical pornography is a possibility, simply because I do not believe the inherent act of filming a sex act is ethical or non-ethical. I believe that ethical porn is a spectrum of behavior that treats performers as workers and as humans, both on set and within the marketing. I’ve personally created work that I would point to as examples of ethical porn, and am lucky to have worked with companies that hold themselves to that standard. I think that we’re seeing the results of how queer porn often joins politics to their pornography in the mainstream, with safer sex being depicted more often, racism being challenged and various big companies focusing on “real chemistry” in their pairings—though we still have a long way to go before that’s the norm.

—Kitty Stryker

Queer porn performer and lecturer on sex work, consent culture, and intersectionality in sex-positive spaces, Kitty Stryker is editor of the anthology Ask: Building Consent Culture. She speaks at universities and conferences about feminism, sex work, body positivity, and queer politics.

I am a radical feminist. I believe that the root of women’s oppression lies in male violence, control and exploitation of female sexuality and reproduction. This is seen in the heteronormative practice of marriage that constructs women and children as possessions of men, and within a rape culture that privileges the practice of PIV [penis-in-vagina] sex and the male orgasm, and fetishizes the idea of consent while invalidating the actual practice therein.

In our current capitalist-patriarchy, the production of ethical pornography still helps to maintain male control of women’s sexuality and the privileging of the male orgasm. The current movement towards the production of ethical pornography is a positive attempt to deal with the consequences of the ubiquity and mainstreaming of violent “gonzo” porn and the production and distribution of images of abuse taken without consent, including that of children and the current rise in “revenge porn.”

In theory, the filming of a sex act is neither inherently ethical nor non-ethical; however, it is not possible to have ethical pornography in our capitalist-patriarchal culture, where women are still constructed as a sex class while the vast majority of the pornography industry, including the supposed free online porn, is owned by a very small group of companies. Ethical porn is not a separate economic entity distinct from the power of mainstream violent, racist, homophobic and misogynist pornography. In a post-patriarchal, post-white supremacist world where poverty does not dictate the “choices” of individuals, it may be possible to make ethical pornography. We simply are not in that position yet.

—Louise Pennington

Louise Pennington is a feminist writer and editor of A Room of Our Own, a collection of essays, poetry, and short stories written by women. She also edited Everyday Victim Blaming: Challenging the Portrayal of Domestic and Sexual Violence and Abuse in the Media. Excerpted from a debate six years ago between Stryker and Pennington which originally appeared in The New Internationalist.

Fight the New Drug is a non-religious and non-legislative organization whose mission is to provide individuals the opportunity to make informed decisions “regarding pornography by raising awareness on its harmful effects using only science, facts, and personal accounts.” According to its website, it “carefully review[s], summarize[s], and present[s] peer-reviewed research about pornography in a clear and concise way that’s engaging and easy… to understand.” Fight the New Drug says it does “not associate with any faith or belief system, nor do we discuss porn and sexual exploitation from a religious or moral perspective.” www.fightthenewdrug.org/